|
Anthony Bourdain has hardly needed an introduction ever
since his best-seller Kitchen Confidential was published in
2000. After a series of successful shows on the Food Network, he
moved to the Travel Channel with “Anthony Bourdain: No
Reservations,” still writes books and is the executive chef of
Les Halles restaurants. He recently released a one-hour
documentary titled “Decoding Ferran Adria,” in which he tries to
understand the father of molecular gastronomy in context, and
now plans on leaving the country for a while. The Main Course
recently sat with him at Les Halles to take a closer look at
this media darling who hates being called a celebrity chef.
How has the restaurant industry changed since the publication of
Kitchen Confidential?
I certainly will not claim to have changed
the business myself, or I don’t think the book changed the
business. But I think the trend continues, this cult of
celebrity chef and this foodie craze that's really a worldwide
phenomenon. This sort of change in priorities has made cooking a
glamour profession, which is an absolutely earthshaking change
from when I started. The reason things were so wild I think in
the kitchens that I came up in, for so many years, was that no
one who cooked ever considered for a second that there was
actually a future in it. It was something you did because it was
a business you felt good in, that you were happy in and that
would have you. Now there's a sense of pride in kitchens that
didn’t exist before, coupled with an expectation, a reasonable
one, that if you do well, you will reap actual benefits and
prestige. Which is something that we never dreamed of enjoying.
Even when attending the Culinary
Institute of America, which was quite a commitment of both time
and money to such profession??
I just wanted to be good at what I love, at
what I was doing. I think we saw a limited future for ourselves,
certainly none of us anticipated ever having to be good at
talking to the media. Now they teach media training at the CIA,
if you want it. And I think it's become a necessary part of
being any kind of a high profile chef, whether you're on
television or write books or not, being able to represent your
place well to journalists and on television. That has, for
better or worse, become an important part of the job. You could
argue that sure, Carême did that too---well yeah, he did that
too, they were hustlers also. But never like this. The prestige
of the cooking trade has risen fantastically. And that's good.
Tell me about your own experience as a
filmmaker for “Decoding Ferran Adria.”
When I was doing the Food Network series, I
developed a very close and happy relationship with the freelance
producers and camera people who were employed to make the show.
We traveled together, we spent a lot of time talking about what
the show would look like, over time, and by the second season on
Food Network, we were essentially, the three of us, making
little mini movies and having a lot of fun doing it. I already
had a window of opportunity to spend time with Adria. I had this
incredible fortuitous access to the man. Because I'd met him on
book tour and we'd gotten along famously, he'd agreed that we
could shoot during this certain period of time. We didn’t have a
deal with Food Network, so the three of us just said, to hell
with it, and we all basically quit, walked away from Food
Network, walked away from New York Times Television, and
self-financed a trip to Spain to shoot what we knew was going to
be something amazing.
I like to think I'm an essayist. Both when I write and when I'm
making television, I'm at my best: it's an essay about things
that happened to me, how I perceived them. I'm not an expert,
I'm not a critic, but I'm an enthusiast and in the film I try to
give a sense of what it's like, particularly for an old-school
cook like me who's sort of instinctively hostile to the idea of
what Adria does, to be exposed to both what he does in his
workshop and in his restaurant, but also to him. It was a very
traumatic yet enjoyable experience. My mind was changed to a
large degree. I came to really respect what he does. And I like
him. I hadn't expected to. So it's just this, an account, in
this case a particularly straight forward account, of you
watching me change, watching my mind being changed. It opens
like an essay, with a central proposition that I don’t really
like the idea of this molecular gastronomy and then over the
course of the essay you see me kind of confused and come around
to another way of thinking. It's fun setting up the show, it's
fun editing, it's fun playing with the music, you're making
things, it's not that different than making food. You're
building a whole out of little pieces. In a perfect world I
wouldn’t be in any of the shows.
Do you think that's the next step?
I'd love to just do voiceover, or write the
voiceover. I like being able to show people what I see, and if I
can induce them to look at things, some things that I'm
passionate about or angry about or conflicted about then have
them see it through my eyes. I don’t have any compulsion at all
to be on camera; I'm a little embarrassed by it, frankly.
Do people expect you to be on camera now
so you have to be?
It's an easy job, I'm not complaining. It
enables me to do things that I'm passionate about like travel
and see the world and everything else. So I'm hardly
complaining. I'm just not always comfortable with seeing myself
on camera. Half of me is an exhibitionist, the other half is
actually kind of shy and embarrassed [laughs]. I'm kind of manic
in the sense that one minute I'm there perfectly happy speaking
in front of 300 people and the next I'm like, ah, I'm such an
asshole. I feel that being good at talking in front of an
audience is in some way shameful.
Why is that?
That it’s being a show-off. Like on most
issues, I'm conflicted [laughs]. But not so terribly so that I’m
not doing it.
How often are you here at Les Halles?
Not much. It depends. When I'm in New York
I'm here a few times a week. But I travel about seven months out
of the year now. Between making the new television show,
promoting, for instance, the old show that was shown here on
Food Network is just now starting to be aired in South Africa,
England, parts of Europe that it wasn't before. It's been a huge
hit in Southeast Asia for some time, so I'll be touring to
promote shows I made two years ago, or a translation of maybe
one book back and the current book. So I'm constantly on a book
tour, making television shows, without ever having endorsed a
single product [laughs]. I'm sort of out there flogging my books
or something and seeing the world, which works out really well,
actually, because I'll go to a country on book tour. So I, of
course as I always seem to all over the world, meet a lot of
chefs and cooks who tend to hang out in the same bars and all
know each other. In a very short period of time I'm pretty well
wired in the town and know all the chefs. So then later when I
come back and I'm planning a television show I'm thinking hey
well, we should go to Barcelona, I know a lot of people there.
It's an amazing scene and I know just the people who'd point us
in the right direction, so it all kind of feeds off itself and
while I'm at it, while on book tour or making a show, I'll write
a couple of magazine articles that will hopefully end up in a
book or whatever I could do. I know I'm lucky to be able to get
paid to tell stories and so I'm doing that with vigor.
You're moving to Vietnam for a year or
more, is that right?
At least a year. I’m
going over in April to set up, to find a house in the
neighborhood that I'm interested in and make some preliminary
arrangements and then I'll go back in December.
Is that sort of a sabbatical, is it for
a show, for a book?
It's all of the above.
First and foremost, I'm passionate about Vietnam and from the
first time I went there I said I just need more of this. I sold
a book based on the simple concept of me going to live in
Vietnam for a year and writing about it, and I could continue to
make shows. Since it's an international travel show I could
certainly meet the crew anywhere in the world. It would be
probably shorter from Saigon, where we're planning on shooting,
than it would be from New York. So I might be able to pop out
for a few weeks at a time and do that but largely, I don’t mind
the idea of disappearing off the grid for a year.
Do you get recognized when you go to
these places? If so, will you really able to disappear?
I’m more recognized in Malaysia and
Singapore than I am here. Which is because I'm on TV more
frequently and the show's a bigger hit there than it is here.
They have the books, I'm on TV all the time, and they really
like the show because I'm just so clearly giddy with enthusiasm
about Asian food. I'm very Asia-centric, I'm really interested
in the whole continent, particularly Southeast Asia, and they
seem to like me back. It's nice to be appreciated in the very
part of the world where you like making television best and you
like being best and you're very interested in writing about.
Would you be interested in opening an
Asian restaurant here in New York?
I would never presume to cook Asian
food---I eat Asian food. Most of the people I respect who cook
Asian food have been cooking the same few dishes for
generations. I'm not so arrogant as to think that I could
understand or reproduce that in my lifetime.
And no interest in fusion?
None. This [embracing Les Halles’ dining
room in a sweeping gesture] is the type of food I should have
been doing my whole career. This is what I'm good at. When I
cook, this is what I should do.
What about cooking school curriculums?
Should they still be very French-focused do you think? Is that
still the base of cooking?
I think that when you are talking about
western cooking, and cooking in any English-speaking country or
European country, that's the basis. When you pick up a chef's
knife, you understand that you already owe a debt to the French.
I think they should be Franco-centric, for now, but at the same
time, the more inclusive the better.
You've been pretty outspoken about the
scandal at the James Beard Foundation. How do you feel about
what's going on now? Is there hope for it?
I'm encouraged by the fact that the entire
board is out. Hopefully, there's some soul searching going. I
think the awards, let me include this in, are still the Oscars
of food. Nobody else is going to step in and supplant that. This
is a good gig here, whoever's in charge of this thing. It's an
important one for this industry. I'm not suggesting they become
like the Peace Corps. But if they are a non-profit that claims
to love cooking, and presumably cooks, the people who actually
do the cooking, then they should take a real hard look at who's
doing the actual cooking, and what it costs them to do dinners
there, and are they giving back to the industry what's
appropriate? Until I see some Mexican faces out there or some
Ecuadorians, then I think they completely abrogated any claim
for legitimacy. They're no different than the food critics out
there who are shaking you for free meals or to cater their
wedding.
You always seem to stand out for the
Mexicans in the kitchen and the people who are doing the real
cooking. Have you thought about you establishing some type of
scholarship?
I would like to. For the time being, I'm
certainly as vocal on the subject as I can possibly be, and
given any opportunity to write about it, talk about it, rave
about it. I certainly helped shepherd many illegal immigrants
over the years into situations where they got their green card
and eventually citizenship. It's personal to me. It's not even a
cause as much as it's personal. It's my whole career. It's been
a constant in my life. The guys I've looked to for guidance and
for support, who've been there for me, day in, day out, so many
of them have been Mexican and Ecuadorian. I always like to see
the good guys win one. More and more you see that, but that's
because of their own hard work. .
You said in a November interview that if
the whole writing and TV gig just stopped working, you'd be
happy going back working the kitchen. Is that true?
I'd be happy doing it. I sure as hell
wouldn’t be as good as I used to be. My God, I'm slowing down.
Older, slower and stupider. You burn out. I go in for a vanity
shift a few times a year, just to prove I can still move in
there, which I can, but could I do it every day? Every day like
I used to? Could I do 14 hours a day, five, six days a week, and
do I want to? I might require slightly cushier arrangements
[laughs].
What would be an alternative career, if
someday you got tired of all that or it didn't work out anymore?
Is there anything else you'd want to do?
I never even considered a writing career as
a potential career, much less television. No, if I'm not a cook
or a chef, I'm screwed. I don't think I could even do the other
stuff. I definitely couldn't do the other stuff, had I not been
a cook first. It's the source of everything. I'd be lost. Now
I'm scared. No, I don't know what I'd do. I'd mop the stalls at
Peepworld or something. I'd be in trouble. No other marketable
skills.
What do you say to kids who are now in
culinary school, be they 19 or 45?
They should understand how fortunate they
are, and certainly make full use of it. They should try to do
brilliantly and make maximum use of the connections they make
there to do a post-school apprenticeship in the best restaurants
that they can pester their way into. They should travel in as
different an array of locations as possible. But they should
always understand that there are a lot of people out there like
me who, when they see them coming through the door, are going to
think, who should I give the job to? This guy, or should I
promote my Mexican dishwasher? They have both the huge
advantage, but also the burden of an education and a life of
relative privilege. The way to always have it in your favor is
to go to work for the very best. You will not be able to afford
to do that, basically, if you get out of school and start
working, because with your education, you're probably making
pretty decent money, okay money, better than you might had you
not been to school. Suddenly, the idea of going backwards and
taking nothing or even spending money to work with a great chef
or go to Spain. But that is such a huge advantage. If you can go
right from school to go work for [Thomas] Keller or Gordon
Ramsay or [Juan Mari] Arzak or one of these guys, that's
invaluable. That’s you resume for the rest of your life. You
walk in the door, you tell people I worked for Gordon Ramsay for
a year, they know everything they need to know about you. They
know you can take an ass-kicking like a champion. Because I know
you have worked for a guy with only absolute relentlessly high
standards, who has impeccable work habits, a sense of humor and
I can kick your ass around the block, and I know you'll still
show up tomorrow. I don't need to look at your resume. Plus,
chances are, if I'm a chef hiring, you come and you tell me you
worked for Gordon Ramsay or Tetsuya Wakuda, if I don't know them
already, I know somebody I can call.
And the names you mentioned are the
people you would consider the best chefs in the industry?
Probably the best chef
in the world is Thomas Keller. Then there are a lot of guys and
women out there. It depends. Ferran Adria, it's a great thing to
have on your resume, but that's going to change the way you look
at food. I've been in that kitchen. That's very different than
the kind of cooking you've be taught in school. You might never
see flame the whole time. Going straight from school to Ferran
Adria, I don't know if I'd recommend!
|